![]() “The court’s dismissive attitude toward precedent … is really just another signal of a conservative majority that’s eager to roll up its sleeves and fix all the issues in the law that conservatives have complained about for years,” Dan Farber, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley, told the Post. Wade has left environmental advocates worried that the Clean Air Act – a bedrock of US environmental regulation for more than 50 years – is likewise in jeopardy, according to The Washington Post. The fact that the court’s right-wing bloc apparently is poised to overturn the precedent of Roe v. Reporters and editors who normally cover the courts could benefit by huddling with colleagues on the environment beat, and vice versa, to get everyone up to speed on a story whose implications are, to say the least, far-reaching. A ruling is expected in June, so it’s not too soon for newsrooms to prepare. Environmental Protection Agency, illustrates. That power extends to the fight against climate change, as a potentially game-changing case currently before the court, West Virginia v. Wade reminds us of the tremendous power the Court has over life in the United States. The leaked US Supreme Court draft opinion on Roe v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |